Sarcoma Clinical Trial Landscape

DataLookout monitors ClinicalTrials.gov daily for new and updated sarcoma trials, tracking changes in your dashboard. With recruiting trials (live count on this page) spanning GIST, leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rare translocation-driven subtypes — built for oncology BD teams, sarcoma-focused CROs, patient advocacy organizations, and academic sarcoma programs tracking this highly molecular pipeline.

Track Sarcoma Trials — Free

The sarcoma clinical trial landscape in 2026

Sarcoma encompasses more than 70 distinct histologic subtypes arising from mesenchymal tissues — bone, muscle, fat, cartilage, and connective tissue — making it among the most molecularly heterogeneous disease categories in oncology. Collectively, sarcomas represent approximately 1% of adult cancers but are disproportionately represented in pediatric and young adult populations and carry substantial mortality in advanced and metastatic settings. The field has historically suffered from small patient populations, insufficient randomized data, and a limited approved drug armamentarium dominated by doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and gemcitabine/docetaxel regimens developed decades ago. That is now changing.

The transformation of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) through KIT/PDGFRA-targeted therapy has become the paradigm case for sarcoma drug development — and a proof-of-concept for the broader field that molecular driver identification leads to dramatically better outcomes. Imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis) turned a near-uniformly fatal disease into a manageable chronic condition; subsequent lines of therapy now include sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib (Qinlock, Deciphera), and avapritinib (Ayvakit, Blueprint Medicines), which specifically targets PDGFRA D842V-mutant GIST — historically imatinib-resistant. The molecular testing infrastructure built for GIST is now being applied across sarcoma broadly, with NTRK, ALK, RET, and SS18-SSX fusions enabling targeted therapy in synovial sarcoma and other translocation-driven subtypes.

The recruiting trials in our database span GIST, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) including leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, and synovial sarcoma, bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma), and ultra-rare subtypes including alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and clear cell sarcoma. Active sponsors include the NCI through SARC (Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration), Memorial Sloan Kettering, Ratio Therapeutics, and AbbVie. The pipeline reflects both histology-agnostic basket approaches and histology-specific molecular designs.

Track every new sarcoma trial automatically

ClinicalTrials.gov updates daily. Our pipeline monitors it for you and delivers a clean digest every morning.

Get the Free Digest — No Credit Card

What we monitor for sarcoma

Our system pulls from the ClinicalTrials.gov API every day. For a sarcoma watch profile, you can configure a saved search for:

GIST as the sarcoma success story — and what it means for histology-specific development

The GIST story begins with a chance observation: Peter Reichardt and colleagues in 2001 reported a dramatic response to imatinib in a single patient with metastatic GIST — a disease for which median survival had been less than 18 months. The subsequent B2222 phase 2 trial showed response rates above 50% with durable remissions in a disease previously refractory to all systemic therapy. The key molecular insight was that GIST arises from oncogenic mutations in KIT (approximately 75–80% of cases) or PDGFRA (approximately 10%), both receptor tyrosine kinases directly inhibited by imatinib. For the first time, a sarcoma had a tractable molecular target and a matched approved therapy.

The decades since have produced a complete treatment algorithm stratified by mutation: KIT exon 11 mutations respond best to imatinib first-line; KIT exon 9 mutations require higher imatinib doses or sunitinib; acquired resistance mutations in KIT exons 17 and 18 are the primary mechanism of imatinib progression and are addressed by ripretinib (a switch-control KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor) and avapritinib (the first selective PDGFRA D842V inhibitor). SDH-deficient GIST — lacking succinate dehydrogenase, driver-negative by conventional testing — represents a biologically distinct entity with different behavior and treatment principles. NF1-associated GIST is yet another distinct molecular class. The lesson: molecular subtype determination is not optional in GIST; it is the foundation of every treatment and clinical trial decision.

The sarcoma field is now attempting to replicate this success across other subtypes. NTRK fusions — present in infantile fibrosarcoma and a small subset of adult STS — are targetable with larotrectinib and entrectinib (both approved agnostic to tumor type). ALK rearrangements in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor respond to alectinib and crizotinib. RET fusions appear in a subset of STS and are targetable with selpercatinib. The emergence of basket trial designs — enrolling patients based on molecular alteration rather than histology — has made genomic profiling mandatory for sarcoma patients entering clinical trials, and has created an entirely new class of clinical registrations that BD and research teams must track: a "sarcoma NTRK basket" trial is as relevant to a sarcoma-focused team as a histology-specific protocol.

Who uses sarcoma trial monitoring

Know what changed, not just that something did

Set up your sarcoma digest in 2 minutes. Delivered to your inbox each morning. Cancel anytime.

Start Free — No Credit Card
Live trial data Data as of 2026-09-16, ClinicalTrials.gov

806 active trials, 477 recruiting.

Industry sponsors run 107 of these trials. The rest are run by universities, hospitals, government bodies and other non-commercial sponsors. The table below lists the 5 largest of 88.

View the full Sarcoma pipeline on the dashboard

Notable trials Ranked by recent tracked changes, ClinicalTrials.gov data as of 2026-09-16
TrialStatusLatest tracked changeSeen
Personalized Radiotherapy for Individualized Treatment Strategies and… NCT07139990RecruitingCompletion pushed: 2030-09-01 → 2032-09-012026-08-18
Safety, PK and Efficacy of ONC-392 in Monotherapy and in Combination of… NCT04140526Active, Not RecruitingPrimary completion pushed: 2026-06-30 → 2026-12-312026-09-15
Palbociclib and INCMGA00012 in People With Advanced Liposarcoma NCT04438824Active, Not RecruitingCompletion pushed: 2026-06 → 2027-062026-09-15
A Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Activity of AGX101 in… NCT06440005RecruitingPrimary completion pushed: 2026-09-06 → 2027-03-062026-09-10
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Extremity Sarcoma NCT04461171RecruitingCompletion pushed: 2026-06 → 2026-122026-08-22

Each trial page shows every change DataLookout has recorded for that trial.

Track these trials with DataLookout

DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov every day and records what changed on each trial: status, enrollment, phase, primary endpoint, completion dates, sites, sponsor, and the stated reason a trial stopped. Add a sponsor or a disease to your watchlist, or save any search, and the changes arrive in a daily or weekly email digest.

Free, $0 forever: 1 sponsor + 1 disease watchlist, 1 saved search in your email digest, track up to 5 individual trials, daily change detection, Trials at Risk (top trial). No credit card.

Starter, $49/month: 3 sponsor + 3 disease watchlists, 3 saved searches in your email digest, track up to 25 individual trials, full Trials at Risk list and landscape reports.

Pro, $149/month: unlimited sponsor and disease watchlists, unlimited saved searches, track unlimited individual trials, CSV export, priority email support.

Start free